From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Dec 11 15:41:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz (mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz [210.86.15.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B77937B433
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from internet1.masaclaw.co.nz ([210.55.57.50])
          by mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP
          id <20011211234145.DAWN20016.mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz@internet1.masaclaw.co.nz>;
          Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:41:45 +1300
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011212123256.02871e50@mail.masaclaw.co.nz>
X-Sender: masaclaw@mail.masaclaw.co.nz
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:35:36 +1300
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Tom Peck <tom@masaclaw.co.nz>
Subject: RE: 1 IP - 1 Firewall - 2 Webservers
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112111429070.5654-100000@InterJet.elischer.
 org>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011212103711.00accef8@mail.masaclaw.co.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi Julian

Yes, we currently have Squid serving this purpose - but as I stated in my 
first email, ALL incoming Client IP's and Addresses are always that of the 
GATEWAY_BOX - so for website security and logs, this isn't the best 
option..  I have yet to try Apache, but I have heard it acts in the same 
way - can someone clarify this?

Thanks

Tom

At 14:30 11/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Actually I misunderstood your original requirement that the
>load be split by domain.
>
>all you want to do is run apache or squid as a proxy
>on the forst machine with the proxy fetching the work
>from the two back-end machines.
>
>
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Tom Peck wrote:
>
> > Hi John
> >
> > How would this work?  The two web servers aren't accessible straight from
> > the Internet - traffic goes via the gateway box.
> >
> > Or do you mean why have two web servers?  Why not put both domains on the
> > one server and then port forward?  That would be nice, but the two
> > different servers are running completely different environments..
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > At 08:07 11/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> > >Why just not use Apache virtual hosts?
> > >Or is it the cacheing you wish to do smarter?
> >
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> >
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message