Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:04:53 -0700
From:      Greg Shenaut <greg@bogslab.ucdavis.edu>
To:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: deleting ports/mail/mh 
Message-ID:  <200210151904.g9FJ4rQ05237@thistle.bogs.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:41:31 PDT." <002c01c2747a$7b22de30$2b6b6fc0@shockwave.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <002c01c2747a$7b22de30$2b6b6fc0@shockwave.org>, "Paul Traina" cleopede:
>Absolutely not, mh is so totally dead it should have been nuked years
>ago.  Everyone has either switched to nmh or abandoned it.  You may
>want to consider renaming nmh to mh.

As a long-time (n)mh user, I agree wholeheartedly with the
deletion+renaming idea.  Having both around, with the wrong
one bearing the right name, is a Bad Idea.

However, another possibility would be "mv mh omh ; mv nmh mh".

But I still thing that "rm mh ; mv nmh mh" is perfectly OK.

Greg Shenaut

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210151904.g9FJ4rQ05237>