From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Feb 27 10:18:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA11248
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cold.org (cold.org [206.81.134.103])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA11236
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (brandon@localhost) by cold.org (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id LAA05459; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 11:19:00 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 11:18:59 -0700 (MST)
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@cold.org>
To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipfw rules problems (NOT operator?)
In-Reply-To: <199702271731.JAA08518@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970227111712.5457A-100000@cold.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>
> 	you said above "furthermore I want it to ONLY allow tcp
> 	packets from 206.81.134.0."  
> 	is this *in*addition*to* telnet dns and lpr?
> 	or a restriction upon dns and lpr (either do/can use udp
> 	in additional to tcp)

Er, its just a general restriction by the IP addr, which seems to be
covered already (i.e. a packet from 1.1.1.1/telnet wouldn't get through).

-Brandon Gillespie