From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 22 22:24: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC65037B400; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 7F32EAE160; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:23:59 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Matt Simerson , hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Ellard Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS server benchmarks vs. OpenBSD, NetBSD? Message-ID: <20020623052359.GJ53232@elvis.mu.org> References: <3D129A60.99AA2608@mindspring.com> <20020622192803.B20405@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020622192803.B20405@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * David O'Brien [020622 19:28] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 09:57:55AM -0400, Matt Simerson wrote: > > FreeBSD has very solid NFS code in addition to being a very robust, > > versatile, and downright fun operating system. It's very easy to do > > everything I want to with FreeBSD. It's NFS is missing locking support > > but it's very fast and works very well with FreeBSD and Mac OS X > > clients. I haven't used it with anything else. Actually FreeBSD 5.x should have lockd support. I should know, I ported it from BSD/os. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message