From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 11:27:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E179106566C for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 11:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673448FC0C for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 11:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q75BR5Oe021552; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:27:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q75BR4X0021549; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:27:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:27:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: ashkab rahmani In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:27:05 +0200 (CEST) Cc: centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 11:27:09 -0000 > i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. > i want to share it on network via nfs. > which file system is better for it? > thank you badly imprecise question. you may share any filesystem. Not sure what you want to achieve. No explanation of "raided" - this means nothing without precise description. If you ask what i do commonly then i would do 8 gmirror-based RAID1 volumes, and standard UFS filesystem on each with softupdates (or softupdates+journal). And move as much as possible software directly to machine. Never create another level of indirection (like NFS) when not needed. if you really HAVE to use NFS heavily i strongly recommend using unfsd from ports and patch if to AVOID constant fsync, and make sure UPS is installed. NFS protocol is terrible by design (not by implementation) resulting in all writes being done synchronously.