From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 31 12:36:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA07779
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:36:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA07765
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA29414; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:35:56 -0800 (PST)
To: "Mike Pritchard" <mpp@mpp.minn.net>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/tmac doc-common doc-syms 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jan 1996 10:59:11 CST."
             <199601311659.KAA09410@mpp.minn.net> 
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:35:55 -0800
Message-ID: <29412.823120555@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Should I just remove the word "Experimental", so that any
> man page that doesn't specify the operating system will come
> up as "BSD"?  We can fix any 3rd party packages as we notice them.

Sounds good to me - I always thought that tag was a little content
free since what's `experimental' mean to all of us?  Pretty different
things, that's what!

> Next, Should FreeBSD 2.2 be listed as "FreeBSD 2.2 Experimental"
> or "FreeBSD 2.2 Development" or some such?  I didn't do that

I've always liked "FreeBSD 2.2 Current" myself.. :-)

					Jordan