From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 21 23:15:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1943E37B4CF; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:15:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAM7FKv70721; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:15:21 +0600 (NS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:15:19 +0600 (NS) From: Max Khon To: Kris Kennaway Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hmm..passwords. In-Reply-To: <20001121215318.A14339@citusc17.usc.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > No longer correct. You don't need to futz with libraries and symlinks > > > any more, > > > > Shouldn't we remove "NODESCRYPTLINKS" from /etc/defaults/make.conf and > > anywhere else it is still used? > > I think so. There's no operational downside to having a library which > can do DES and MD5 passwords any more, since it won't stubbornly > default to DES. The original reason for the NODESCRYPTLINKS bandaid > seems to be fixed, unless I'm forgetting something. so we will have single libcrypt and one can always rely on that fact that des_crypt is in system? /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message