From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 7 6: 8:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [63.67.141.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4E414F7B; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 06:08:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA26465; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 09:07:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 09:03:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Peter Wemm Cc: Warner Losh , Warren Welch , Kevin Day , Ugen Antsilevitch , questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI modems do not work??? In-Reply-To: <19990907100735.8E89B1CA9@overcee.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > Well, it seems Bruce objects to this.. I don't know why though. If > he's concerned about loosing the tightly integrated sio<->isa stuff > then I guess there could be an "osio" (old sio) or "isasio" or > something driver that remains isa-specific. I could well imagine this > could be important for older/slower machines. Is he on the same page as the rest of us here? We're just talking about the probe/attach bits, and anywhere else that makes use of isa_get_foo() calls that could be handled via more abstract methods right? I don't get this non-maintainence maintainer role here. - Confused in Maryland. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message