From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 07:26:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AA116A4CF for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 07:26:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from utopia.in.force-elite.com (force-elite.com [216.255.199.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F321A43D5C for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 07:26:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chip@force-elite.com) X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [10.10.10.101] (199.5.172.2:48218)Server] id for from ; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 00:26:39 -0700 From: Paul Querna To: Mathieu Arnold In-Reply-To: <40632F58270859A8563CA1F3@nescarba.in.t-online.fr> References: <1094364149.29415.38.camel@localhost> <40632F58270859A8563CA1F3@nescarba.in.t-online.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 01:29:50 -0600 Message-Id: <1094369391.29415.42.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.92.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 2.0 -> 2.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 07:26:41 -0000 On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 09:20 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 05/09/2004 00:02 -0600, Paul Querna écrivait : > | I don't believe any plans are 100% set in stone yet, but many of the > | committers(including me) from Apache would like to make a new stable 2.2 > | branch this fall. (Likely during ApacheCon, November 13-17). > | > | This release has lots of cool new features (And, I don't want to write a > | summary document right now...), but my main question is for the FreeBSD > | Ports, will you shift the main Apache2 port to the 2.2 branch, or will > | you create a separate httpd-2.2 port? > | > | I don't want to even imply switching over on the 2.2.0 release day, but > | what is the general plan for FreeBSD? > > If apache 2.2 is a stable release, I think that apache2 will be copied to > apache20 so that people can use it still, and apache2 will be updated to the > 2.2 branch. > Yes, it will be a 'stable' release. For all 2.X.Y Releases HTTPd will use the even/odd minor numbers to indicate the stable branch. eg: 2.0.XX = stable 2.1.XX = development 2.2.XX = stable 2.3.XX = development ... etc -Paul Querna