Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:05:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>, Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Misuse of PORTREVISION (Re: svn commit: r434379 - head/multimedia/x265) Message-ID: <20170221160503.GA53020@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2dd922e8-af48-6245-752a-061af7a91a5a@FreeBSD.org> References: <20170218210541.82AA915F6@freefall.freebsd.org> <f23cecfc-d669-e62b-1916-1e16e66fb3eb@aldan.algebra.com> <a9be8749-360f-15fb-aa75-93a378371c51@FreeBSD.org> <2dd922e8-af48-6245-752a-061af7a91a5a@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:56:17PM +0000, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: > As I've said many times, we should just kill these outdated tools and > use pkg (not make!) to resolve build depends. It is merely a political > decision not technical one. Well make(1) is not an outdated tool. :) Also keeping pkg(8)'s involvement until very late in the packaging stage make the process more transparent and easier to debug/hack on. I personally like it the way it is now, and I understand why you're having traction with this proposal of yours. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170221160503.GA53020>