From owner-freebsd-atm Thu Feb 24 0:40:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2235237BAED for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:40:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.100]) by tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/21/00) with ESMTP id RAA26124; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:40:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp by nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/01/18/00) with ESMTP id RAA26191; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:40:51 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp) Received: from CF-S21 (meseipc-abepad.pflab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.17.139]) by imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id RAA08892; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:40:54 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20000224172427.00a2d400@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> X-Sender: ha006@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:46:59 +0900 To: Kenjiro Cho , freebsd-atm@freebsd.org From: Hirofumi ABE Subject: Re: Traffic shaping on HARP Cc: abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp In-Reply-To: <20000223222947T.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> References: <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <4.2.0.58.J.20000223194418.00a552d0@imi.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 22:29 00/02/23 +0900, Kenjiro Cho wrote: >Hirofumi ABE wrote: > > Now, I use 3 PVCs among 4 sites, and use en drivers on FreeBSD2.2.8R. > > To cap the bandwidth of PVC, I use pvctxctl in ALTQ. > > But it is a problem that en drivers don't supports RFC1483 encapsulation. > >If you are using en0, you have to set a flag to use LLC/SNAP >encapsulation. > > # route add -iface 128.252.200.2 -link en0:3.0.0.c9 > ^ 3 means AAL5/LLCSNAP > >If you are using pvc0, LLC/SNAP is added by default. > >Or, are you talking about a different thing by RFC1483? Thanks! This is what I want. I confirmed BSD box using en drivers can be connected through cisco4000. This works very well when we use ping, telnet and http, but only ftp-data doesn't. The cisco seems to discard the data. Why only ftp-data cause? - hirofumi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message