From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 26 15:33:28 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA29451 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 15:33:28 -0700 Received: from databank.com (bsinger@databank.com [198.3.149.253]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA29436 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 15:33:22 -0700 Received: from localhost by databank.com (8.6.5/1.37) id RAA16685; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 17:39:53 -0500 From: bsinger@databank.com (Smooch) Message-Id: <199504262239.RAA16685@databank.com > Subject: Re: The Mentors' Club To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 17:39:52 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <199504260900.LAA00448@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> from "Julian Howard Stacey" at Apr 26, 95 11:00:18 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 926 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk What about something a little simpler: * Newbie sends mail to {newbie,help}@freebsd.org, * which is distributed to a mailing list newbie-q@freebsd.org, * which is read by someone who knows something about the topic, who replies. * Reply-To points back to help mechanism, * which sends the reply to the newbie, * saving it with the help message to keep track of where the problems are and to add to the FAQ. * Newbie also gets a message explaining the mentor system * and is attached to the mentor, * and newbie-q is sent an automatic "This person taken care of" message. After getting a response, Newbie should write directly to the mentor, and not help@freebsd. Someone (or newbie-q again) gets a message if a help message hasn't been replied to in reasonable time, and newbie-q can also be used for mentors-above-their-heads. I think this would get replies to users faster, and by the right person. Ben