From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 04:38:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD3A106564A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madis555@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F8B8FC12 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so331261wyh.13 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:38:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Me2cvH7DS6+DgA2cbNgv2W7JlyKg7Igd9qqhqgQTsbc=; b=DkT51oqoMT4ndehQgVB364fwjHhzad1flrxjmkkWpyJsfxkKSUDsWnud78vwQb8sso 4HmOaDcy9WWEDETbK+evGLkB9WFEWZIjFmHqgwy6bEMb9f2Ucldv7fRNW2FfwzF8aWpS Bblm7Y1LWtb9D94XTwfzlmJOFmbqyALwDPSfg= Received: by 10.216.28.148 with SMTP id g20mr197389wea.100.1315456723714; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:38:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ketas-laptop.mydomain (195.20.191.90.dyn.estpak.ee [90.191.20.195]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fq2sm2771964wbb.24.2011.09.07.21.38.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Sulev-Madis Silber Message-ID: <4E6846D1.60506@hot.ee> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:38:41 +0300 From: Sulev-Madis Silber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110907 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org References: <4E6810E4.3040904@hot.ee> In-Reply-To: <4E6810E4.3040904@hot.ee> X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20110908073841276 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: T60 resumes (!) into panic with 9.0-BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:38:45 -0000 Oh, I really forgot the issue about SMP. Turns out that it indeed works either with i386 + UP or with amd64 + SMP Now I need to think is it worth to upgrade, err... I mean sidegrade, to amd64 or not. Only because suspend with SMP?! Machine is 1.83GHz C2D, 2GB RAM. No real benefits. Need to think, there is some old patch that fixes i386 + SMP and there are someone who only needs more time to complete this task. I'm not quite ready yet for this kind of hackery myself. Anyway, the issue is partly "solved", so to say.