From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 7 04:38:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D496D106566C for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 04:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661098FC15 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 04:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8426 invoked by uid 399); 7 Feb 2010 04:38:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.110?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 7 Feb 2010 04:38:10 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B6E43C0.3060302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:38:24 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100123 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce M Simpson References: <201002062122.o16LM1eS042778@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201002062122.o16LM1eS042778@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r203574 - head/etc X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:38:12 -0000 On 02/06/10 13:22, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Author: bms > Date: Sat Feb 6 21:22:01 2010 > New Revision: 203574 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/203574 > > Log: > Add sane-port (Scanner Access Now Easy) as port 6566. Are all the port numbers that have been added recently things that have been requested by users? IIUC there is a cost "albeit small" for parsing the /etc/services file each time it's read, so traditionally we've tried to keep it as small as possible while still meeting the needs of our users. I'm not calling for a backout, just curious. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso