From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 30 15:57:25 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36507106566B
	for <freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C048FC1F
	for <freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.101])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA00777;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:39:28 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4E5D0430.9090606@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:39:28 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Ambrose <ambrosehua@gmail.com>
References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com>
	<201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net>
	<4E5CA9BE.2020005@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CAE-mSOLu-ZkKGw6f01T1NDHTmeVDaAXmicrDzaEaqXdyg7ggCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMwoQQ7ZsB83xL-+LJkOQfa-FUcW2Q2E+M0LbDn+Gta=cFJPMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMwoQQ7ZsB83xL-+LJkOQfa-FUcW2Q2E+M0LbDn+Gta=cFJPMg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:05:10 +0000
Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:57:25 -0000

on 30/08/2011 16:45 Paul Ambrose said the following:
> I do not believe the current status of DTrace is appropriate for promoting
> 
> 1. DTrace is an experimental function  or Semi-finished products. The kernel
> dtrace support is ok, but the userland support is far from completion(at
> least the pid  provider has many bugs)
> 
> 2  the FreeBSD implementation is different from Solaris/Mac OS X. The
> DTraceToolkit, which has many amazing feature, can not 100% works on
> FreeBSD, and there is no doc to identify the difference.
> 
> 3 There is a missing feature list about DTrace, but no schedule list about
> when to fix it.

4. There is a missing developer/maintainer for DTrace on FreeBSD.

Nevertheless the kernel DTrace is quite usable and useful for kernel debugging.

-- 
Andriy Gapon