From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 20:43:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C037916A4CE; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:43:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (dsl390.iae.nl [212.61.63.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FCA43D6A; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:43:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from [212.61.27.71] (dual [212.61.27.71]) by freebee.digiware.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7NKhrEg065954; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:43:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Message-ID: <412A5709.2070704@withagen.nl> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:43:53 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <20040822115345.Y94593@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20040823111304.GA767@zaphod.nitro.dk> <412A2CCF.4050809@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <412A2CCF.4050809@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: PLEASE TEST: IPI deadlock avoidance patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:43:59 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > Now to start work on the preemption hangs.. > Well my dual AMD64 system seemed to be rather stable since I went with a Tyan board. So I though lets be brave, and see how far we get with PREEMPTION.... I did not get anywhere..... Right at boot time: start_init: trying /sbin/init panic: runq_choose: no proc on busy queue cpuid = 0; KDB: stack backtrace: kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x37 panic() at panic+0x1e2 runq_choose() at runq_choose+0x6f kseq_choose() at kseq_choose+0xc8 sched_choose() at sched_choose+0x5b choosethread() at choosethread+0x47 sched_switch() at sched_switch+0x185 mi_switch() at mi_switch+0x28d sleepq_switch() at sleepq_switch+0x123 sleepq_timedwait() at sleepq_timedwait+0xe msleep() at msleep+0x425 g_io_schedule_down() at g_io_schedule_down+0x95 g_down_procbody() at g_down_procbody+0x40 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0xe9 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe Dumping not possible since the system did not grow any kbd input. Probably way to early to try this, but I was just curious. Question: Is this patch going into 6.0-CURRENT or in 5.3???? --WjW