Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:26:44 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT Message-ID: <4FEF7D24.8070406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB8F@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <4FEAA280.2070705@FreeBSD.org> <4FEAA599.9070107@FreeBSD.org> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB6D@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <4FEAC5B1.30104@FreeBSD.org> <4FEB6D2B.4090508@FreeBSD.org> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB84@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB8E@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <4FEE17E1.90304@FreeBSD.org> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3012CA28AEB8F@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sounds great, thanks again! Doug On 06/29/2012 02:20 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: > Doug, > > --nthreads option corresponds to --parallel option of NGNU > and it will be renamed. The other four proprietary options > will be marked as non-portable in the man page. > > After nthreads==>parallel renaming, NBSD will support all > NGNU options. > > Thank you for the suggestion. > Oleg > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb@FreeBSD.org] >> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:02 PM >> To: Oleg Moskalenko >> Cc: FreeBSD Current >> Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT >> >> On 06/29/2012 01:50 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: >>> 5) NBSD adds several of its own new proprietary options: >>> >>> --mergesort >>> --qsort >>> --heapsort >>> --radixsort >>> --nthreads=... (multi-threaded build only) >> >> Oleg, >> >> First, thank you very much for providing both the performance numbers, >> and the breakdown in the differences in command line options. >> Everything >> looks great, my only concern is the above. >> >> Are there similar/identical options in NGNU that correspond to the >> options above? If so, I would be hesitant to add new names for them >> because it hurts portability between platforms. If these are totally >> new >> features then my assumption is that you have clearly marked them as >> non-portable in the man page? >> >> Once again, I really appreciate you addressing my concerns, and your >> hard work on this project. >> >> Doug >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FEF7D24.8070406>