From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 00:35:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5ED106564A for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 462268FC14 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8205 invoked by uid 0); 24 Sep 2010 00:35:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2010 00:35:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=Hah9hXm2R77O1ITp7oyXmKa1SFjVFJ1oVTSSWBq6Axv65YoTbUh4L0dWfWoUqzryf5ORSlbwzFFP+sFM7SBfZoRgqs5/Fw+x2KbscBrQOxnEGinq+D7bFs+JE5WyYXqD; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OywG0-0005DB-Ho for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:35:21 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:31:20 -0600 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:31:20 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100924003120.GA19235@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3368057398-783131724@intranet.com.mx> <20100923152023.GA14903@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: GUI Suggested? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:35:22 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: >=20 > If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad, > lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and > vim-like (among other things ;-). Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotwm developer(s)? Earlier today, I read this on the site: "On the other hand xmonad has great defaults, key bindings and xinerama support but is crippled by not being written in C." What's up with that? How does Haskell "cripple" xmonad? --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyb8VgACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUdRwCeNMeNmttwp/AdfwVPgMjMIfyH 2sEAnj8qxPhvKo7EnaydO98d1CrWw4Xd =aIG2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--