From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 30 14:46:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93712106564A for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E62C8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:46:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=CxOyQiiVexNXbxbOdi8C36I+h/fgMCsG4xTvQ/k+eU4=; b=QOrkwwVt/v22Aq8efUSXGN7AWLqOAZBWph8X5X30r6LP1wXJ5xmF35D2Zlq+Di1UVleEVhWAa0JKJFgd5TacL7HUOmLOrgjKlExONtWLFA3FKkkuXA2msUUL7PyjnxV0; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RrsVE-000EC6-DW for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:46:43 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1327934794-18602-18600/5/5; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:46:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <4F264B27.6060502@brockmann-consult.de> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:46:34 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4F264B27.6060502@brockmann-consult.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: ZFS sync / ZIL clarification X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:46:44 -0000 Thanks Peter. You're also confirming my original suspicions and the results of my testing. I'm going to continue forward with this ZFS SAN backend for ESXi project with iSCSI via istgt, which actually works surprisingly well. Honestly, NFS would have been quite useful, but it never would have made sense in our environment because you can't properly multipath to it without pNFS / NFS 4.1, which isn't available in FreeBSD yet and will take some time to prove its stability anyway.