From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 13 16:50:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDA116A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:50:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D1643D48
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:50:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DAWHF-0000Y6-EH
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:49:17 +0100
Received: from kvip88.kvi.nl ([129.125.15.152])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:49:17 +0100
Received: from A.S.Usov by kvip88.kvi.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:49:17 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: "Alexander S. Usov" <A.S.Usov@kvi.nl>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:50:05 +0100
Organization: KVI
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <d11qu7$afn$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <d0s9te$e8n$1@sea.gmane.org> <plop85ll8t507z.fsf@gnu-rox.org>
	<d118kl$pq0$1@sea.gmane.org> <plop85r7ij8z7a.fsf@gnu-rox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: kvip88.kvi.nl
User-Agent: KNode/0.8.2
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Gmane-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: freebsd-current@m.gmane.org
X-MailScanner-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Using cpufreq
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:50:19 -0000

Xavier Maillard wrote:
> What do you use as you supfile ? (default tag)

RELENG_5

> Here I am using -CURRENT maybe cpufreq has not hit -STABLE.

I decided to give it a try after seeng this in UPDATEING:
20050225:
    The cpufreq framework has been merged.  As part of this, the sysctls
    for acpi(4) throttling have been removed.  See cpufreq(4) for the
    new sysctl interface.  The power_profile script has also been updated,
    so you can use performance/economy_cpu_freq in rc.conf(5) to set AC
    on/offline cpu frequencies.  No new cpufreq drivers have been brought
    in with this import but drivers from -current can now be built and run
    on -stable.

It looks that the last sentence is a bit incorrect, and should be read as 
"No cpufreq drivers have ......"

-- 
Best regards,
  Alexander.