From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Nov 22 21:19:19 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA09957
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 21:19:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA09951
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 21:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.2/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA24710; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 21:19:16 -0800 (PST)
To: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ATAPI (was: Who needs Perl? We do!) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Nov 1996 22:25:49 CST."
             <XFMail.961122223634.dkelly@hiwaay.net> 
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 21:19:16 -0800
Message-ID: <24708.848726356@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Input like this? (the data part of this ATAPI drive works, the audio
> stuff isn't fully functional).

Uh, no.  This actually fails on several counts:

1. It does not state the exact make and model, as I asked.  We need
   succinct information at the moment more than we need elaborate
   script output from which such information must be intuited.

2. It contains information which would really be more relevant
   to an entirely different class of bug report, e.g. audio
   support.  To be honest, for this round I'm not really interested
   in audio support at all so much as I am data support.  If it
   is able to load a FreeBSD release then it's working more than
   reasonably enough for our purposes.

   I'm not saying that audio support is not important, simply that
   it is not relevant at this time.

Thanks!
						Jordan