From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 9 16:58:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA06771 for current-outgoing; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:58:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA06730 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:58:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA05622; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:54:52 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802100054.QAA05622@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Dmitrij Tejblum cc: jbryant@unix.tfs.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging win95 and nt filesystem changes into msdosfs In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Feb 1998 03:49:58 +0300." <199802100049.DAA02713@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 16:54:51 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I should also point out that there is another diff, msdosfs-vfat.diff, in > incoming. This diff is for 2.2. It is original and independent work of > Luoqi Chen. It is not supposed to support FAT32. May be, now Luoqi did some > further development of his work. I think that this is where things hit a logjam last time; there are two sets of incompatible patches to achieve two desirable things. Until the two sets of patches are _merged_, there is unlikely to be anything committed. Can you two perhaps get together and sort this out? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe current" in the body of the message