From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 29 12:07:21 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A206D16A40F;
	Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0648E43D49;
	Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:07:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2])
	by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id C2881B859;
	Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:07:19 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 2102 invoked by uid 1002);
	Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:07:19 -0000
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:07:19 +0300
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20060629120719.GA2076@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
References: <200606281034.k5SAYjhS084686@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20060629091205.GA1300@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
	<20060629123042.5vvc68edk4s0ccok@netchild.homeip.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060629123042.5vvc68edk4s0ccok@netchild.homeip.net>
X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: frank@opengroupware.org, Boris Samorodov <bsam@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, durian@shadetreesoftware.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/linux-opengroupware Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:07:21 -0000


--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:12:06 +030=
0):
[...]
> >Hmmz, you set the EXPIRATION_DATE in the past (2006-06-15).
> >Are you sure this is what you intended?
>=20
[...]
>=20
> Aside from this, I don't think this expiration date hurts. Currently =20
> the port can not be used (see the content of the PR). All we need to =20
> do is to get the native version into the ports tree.
>=20

The thing is that setting EXPIRATION_DATE in the past is the same as
removing the port immediately (because someone, for example me :-),
will pick it up and remove it because it has expired).

--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv

Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
                -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFEo8J2Fw6SP/bBpCARAtBrAJ9F84USQ+6rcSVpb0ey8mpEXeR5mgCfTKbv
VpGXiSFeqc/vbSbcei5N0b4=
=Ju09
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--