From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 6 22:50:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049F816A41F for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CB043D53 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB6Mo674070178 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jB6Mo66s070176; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:50:06 GMT Message-Id: <200512062250.jB6Mo66s070176@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Nick Johnson Cc: Subject: Re: kern/90050: boot -s drops serial console at sh prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Johnson List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:50:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/90050; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nick Johnson To: Kris Kennaway Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/90050: boot -s drops serial console at sh prompt Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:43:02 -0800 (PST) On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:35:54PM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>> Did the same thing work under 5.4? >> >> I'm afraid I honestly don't remember. I'm not sure if I ever tried it, >> because this box was born a 5.4 machine; I don't know if I ever booted it >> single-user remotely. > > So how do you know it's a 6.0 bug and not misconfiguration? :) Are you suggesting that the behaviour is appropriate? That dropping the serial console once you get to a prompt somehow makes sense? I'm not going to get into a nerd-slapping fight / cock-size contest over this. Getting defensive and sanctimonious every time a bug is reported is counterproductive. It's just a bug report. It's not a commentary on anyone's worth as a developer or human being. It's simply a problem that should be fixed, because it doesn't make any sense the way it is now. Either this project is committed to quality or it isn't. Frankly I don't care which it is. I'm not going to fight about it every time I file a PR. Nick