Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:53:35 -0800
From:      "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Cc:        Randy Pratt <bsd-unix@embarqmail.com>, x11@freebsd.org, Florent Thoumie <flz@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: x11-drivers/xf86-video-mga: current issues 
Message-ID:  <20080108215335.03F404500E@ptavv.es.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:04:56 MST." <20071213105120.U6078@wonkity.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1199829215_77341P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:04:56 -0700 (MST)
> From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
> Sender: owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
> 
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Randy Pratt wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:17:22 +0000
> > "Florent Thoumie" <flz@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Can I have confirmation from a couple people that the patch from
> >> ports/117726 actually solves most (if not all) problems with the mga
> >> driver?
> >
> > I've been using the xf86-video-mga-1.4.7,1 from that PR for awhile
> > now and it performs like previous versions.  I can't use the version
> > presently in the tree for reasons discussed on this mailing list:
> >
> >  http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071103180058.1c1bd333.bsd-unix
> >  http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071103114415.7d910c32.bsd-unix
> >
> > I did try to fuss with the xf86-video-mga-1.9.100 using xrandr and such
> > and did manage to get a resolution my eyes could live with but mplayer
> > would only display a blue screen in its window.  This version certainly
> > didn't work out-of-the-box for me.
> >
> > I'm in favor of the patched version from ports/117726 but there was
> > some discussion of having both versions in the tree since the newer
> > version seemed to have solved some dual-head issues for others.
> > They'll have to speak up regarding those though since I can't readily
> > find the list references.
> 
> Last I tried 1.4.7, dualhead did not work at all.  Single monitor setups 
> were okay.
> 
> Has anyone who had problems with 1.9.100 contacted Tilman Sauerbeck or 
> put a bug report on bugs.freedesktop.org?  It would be nice to see this 
> problem fixed so we could all be running the same version.
> 
> -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA

Amen!

Now that I have rolled back(?) to 1.9.100 and my dual screen system is
back to normal.

This should teach me to read mail BEFORE upgrading ports when I have
been off-line for a couple of weeks. 

Thanks for your work on this, Warren (and flz).
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

--==_Exmh_1199829215_77341P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002

iD8DBQFHg/Dekn3rs5h7N1ERAt8rAJ9avDRJl1bje7vMCKm9M5FBVT5heQCeKmJJ
xGdDCGnpGvJX8n1o1CCq8WI=
=WxwY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1199829215_77341P--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080108215335.03F404500E>