From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 05:02:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637A216A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:02:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3577E43D1F for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:02:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.247.57] (helo=[192.168.99.66]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.43) id 1CLaWV-000CLa-Oe for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:02:33 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20041023014300.33f7e5af@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> References: <20041023014300.33f7e5af@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Message-Id: From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:02:29 -0600 To: FreeBSD questions list X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.247.57 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1+cvs (built Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:44:05 -0700) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on hobbiton.shire.net) Subject: Re: "stress" testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:02:33 -0000 On Oct 23, 2004, at 12:43 AM, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:14:06 -0600 > "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" wrote: > >> Hi >> >> In reading one of the various performance threads recently in either >> >> -questions or -current, I seem to recall someone mentioning a >> utility that can be used to do some sort of "stress" testing. The >> reference was in a man page style [ command(n) ] type reference in >> the thread. I though I saved it but cannot find it. Is there some >> sort of port or utility or command that can do general >> system/sub-system stress testing? >> >> I don't have any specific needs or requirements. The reference just >> >> looked interesting and I wanted to look into the facility mentioned >> to see what it does and if it would be useful to me somehow to >> stress new systems etc. > > You may find something of interest under the bench marking section of > the ports tree > Thanks to all who replied in-list or off-list. Thanks Chad