From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 11 19:51:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA09933 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 19:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perki0.connect.com.au (perki0.connect.com.au [192.189.54.85]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA09905 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 19:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nemeton.UUCP (Unemeton@localhost) by perki0.connect.com.au with UUCP id MAA13200 (8.8.5/IDA-1.6); Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:50:44 +1000 (EST) Received: from topaz.nemeton.com.au (topaz.nemeton.com.au [203.8.3.18]) by nemeton.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA22104; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:11:24 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost.nemeton.com.au (localhost.nemeton.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by topaz.nemeton.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA10732; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:13:26 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <199704120213.MAA10732@topaz.nemeton.com.au> To: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: on the subject of changes to -RELEASEs... In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:13:26 +1000 From: Giles Lean Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 11 Apr 1997 17:52:20 -0500 (EST) pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co wrote: > Mprog, P=/bin/sh, F=lsDFMoqeu9, S=10/30, R=20/40, D=$z:/, > T=X-Unix, > A=sh -c $u > _____________ > I have not heard of cracking attempts to sendmail RECENTLY, These days they're just a given. Only worth a comment when someone breaks (publically) the latest released version. > but it IS > recommended to use smrsh (included with sendmail) on all versions. Why > aren't we including this? Because this requires (as you know) that vacation, procmail and whatever else people use from .forward files be installed in the one directory that smrsh will run programs from. This will break existing installations. I recommend that we make this change for the 3.0 release. Giles