From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Oct  6 10:19:52 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from world.std.com (world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7CA37B66C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Oct 2000 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from kwc@localhost)
	by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA17228;
	Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
Message-Id: <200010061715.NAA17228@world.std.com>
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> 
    <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com>
    <A0E035400B00D4118F9E0008C70D4D77A88A@ITC1>
    <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org>
    <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct  6 13:04:01 2000
>To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
>Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices 
>Cc: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
>Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 10:59:57 -0600
>From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
>
>: >Given THAT information does anybody have any further clues?
>: >Again, this machine is an Abit BP6, two Linksys Ether16 ISA
>: >NICs. Kernel config for them is:
>: >
>: >  device          ed0     at isa? port 0x2c0 irq 15 iomem 0xd8000
>: 
>: Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ?  Is that IRQ
>: disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup?
>
>Maybe that's where we should look.  Does the ata probe for
>the slave somehow fail to release irq 15?
>
>The hardware config is fine (I've been over it in private
>email sevearl times).

Ah, ok...  :)

>: >  device          ed1     at isa? port 0x340 irq 9 iomem 0xd8000
>: 
>: I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared"
>: one & it has always "frightened" me some...  :)
>
>IRQ 9 is fine.  Nothing wrong with it.  It isn't shared at
>all.  It used to be irq 2, but that's now used for chaining.
                                                    ^^^^^^^^
That's the word I was looking for...  :)

>Warner

Thanks,

-kc


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message