From nobody Wed Oct 15 16:59:15 2025 X-Original-To: pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cmy3x04lNz6CgFc; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cmy3w6kYVz3vLj; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760547564; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pvz5jwGKClP9Ym9e7J0njqehOZ4kw7bVyzdf5+Nl4mo=; b=kB20Jj7t49akmdvSIaaSMbZUFCvv+BPzus5UZS3m4jnMzN3tgBG2Xc0/mrKSrxzFLH+X18 oTRTTqJX/wjN2DT41n+l1/YB7KWdXgwTPj5qRlIHJJfKs19ybHVOIW2b4znUfCaI9W4UJI twNbBE6L1W4li94yFzzVGK7TsHPZfg8clZmpX5o6rro6nyYI1rRKpYmoupKbJwdaHpSPAb 4rTPv5gXEAikpMGSbOiOlWTpRZIqzgXsUaw+w8vP+/LGfaV3L35FL26t3DiP/5DxAowYHu OlnRjiH1gmU8MegeYMJWyK0DfMEnfiWFEEqgw5bSL/e5DLeluIyR7d+55nvHkg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760547564; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pvz5jwGKClP9Ym9e7J0njqehOZ4kw7bVyzdf5+Nl4mo=; b=v5zr9zr0U20x1joKB2nJ+MLFFXJL2mVqruZpf35fs7lb0bf/tq4zBzh4P5EeiD8IF+pzhc 9BJ4lD4YLD/tflkhoEKMU/KzLYB9+PbHLb5h00jwsZ7x6fyXXEZUi0B/m0BVrXm4QvDVe+ fGK60/wYVm6ouiETS0KSchM7GDtsdjejAinpA/pO8AL2rdBM8TWPseWll56NtBUA2HQyh5 REzOaIwwg4c3W8tb8jHR8pBQYhBjuBSWDoPbYzpJn5rPh3Sa4h1O3zdTa9kx23vvicB77E yeiNTR9pHnrw+UnAKJ4HG3Vqvv+TloqKB6+fjTY/fuckEZZeks1C5fIGfHYQsQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1760547564; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZBeD0ob4h/wpSSJcHSVpw5+K9VZKuPyKVb54aXC/I/hxhjz8YPqPH5J2A5Qznf/4dpWR+u UOIcG9PFkbojmWvlcYY/USZf5qeAQ2VmlN7/AxU0fdKzNniiV/yTvfmPlJTa63/UO4moB2 0svFNfwDIqWim72/HfRDwIj+2GWbtOyME00kwGr3r42wiA8CULnjEWS0ZXxNu3XcKzgtl5 UCOk66JjBuV/jMDndLdlHR1AL2rsUF4qS5dF6vabVPhhE9V0nXvRZAiVF2OTnOI16xaVNf gG17SB3MItc/vUMJRq+P16se4wTZMYn3DkNpCwbQJ1HKGWEQQfJA/lwkaAVl4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from amaryllis.le-fay.org (amaryllis.le-fay.org [IPv6:2a00:1098:6b:400::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ivy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4cmy3w2jy6zFMP; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 17:59:15 +0100 From: Lexi Winter To: Roger Marquis Cc: Ronald Klop , current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Roger Marquis , Ronald Klop , current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org References: <43B68BB6-02FA-470E-A8C5-99D15E3707D7@FreeBSD.org> <89861E7A-64C7-47CB-89F6-A93AB14813FF@FreeBSD.org> <3E63F63B-0C90-43E2-BF55-30310B7599D3@FreeBSD.org> <7r257p26-qqs6-r1q3-9456-qn3o02rson6r@mx.roble.com> List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pGgWlkskTzDhD1Dr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --pGgWlkskTzDhD1Dr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger Marquis wrote in : > On Wed, 15 Oct 2025, Lexi Winter wrote: > > we will never ship a set for a "minimal jail" because this is entirely > > up to the user requirements. there is *no* package which is absolutely > > required to install a jail, because it depends on what you will install > > in the jail. so it doesn't make sense to ship any sort of package set > > like this. >=20 > How could it not make sense when 'distroless' Linux container images are > so popular? i have no idea what a "distroless Linux container image" is. could you please describe this in more detail? --pGgWlkskTzDhD1Dr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaO/S3wAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YJDYAQCZH9Q4G7AHGulfCf0QiogV2Mw+pwGJGGanGdhzSs17fwD/RXILzMvXXqsX vYNUsLgLqCISXoaJ6fANutzyGIdRKgk= =aZeC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pGgWlkskTzDhD1Dr--