From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 07:02:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F041065670; Mon, 14 May 2012 07:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5958FC0C; Mon, 14 May 2012 07:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4E72SeG091364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 May 2012 09:02:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:02:28 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120514070228.GW71676@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Barton , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-user@freebsd.org, freebsd-current References: <201205111608.q4BG8ppa090644@svn.freebsd.org> <4FB0455F.9010602@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FB0455F.9010602@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r235275 - projects user X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 07:02:33 -0000 On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 16:35:59 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > When you proposed these changes not only did I not see a consensus for > you to move forward, I saw a non-zero number of people push back. > > Why did you proceed? - I had a non-zero number of people tell me that it looked good. - Peter doesn't seem to mind the clarification. - No objections were raised after I send out the changed patch which basically keeps things the way they were originally intended. Did you actually read what has been committed? Uli - amazed that a change to a document that apparently no one is reading can cause such a fuss.