From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 23 07:19:32 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9613A16A4BF
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 07:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AF943F85
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 07:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h7NEJUUK021285;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:19:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030823075750.GB47245@starjuice.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308231014350.20510-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: jdk14 on -current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:19:32 -0000

On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

> On (2003/08/23 09:55), Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> 
> > On (2003/08/22 22:33), Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > 
> > > Has anyone tried building jdk14 on -current.  I've never been
> > > lucky enough to get it to build.  It seems to be failing now
> > > because of the compiler:
> > 
> > It built fine before the second-last gcc upgrade to 3.3.1. :-(
> 
> There was supposed to be more.
> 
> I meant that the build failures started with gcc version 3.3.1 [FreeBSD]
> 20030711 (prerelease).
> 
> It may be that 3.3.1 release magically resupports the broken C++ syntax,
> but I'm not hopeful.

As our base compiler, I doubt it.  The port may; IIRC, the port
is not as strict as our base compiler.

> I recall that someone said he was working on this, but can't remember
> who.  I may be wrong.

I think it's just improper use of concatenation, as in foo##bar,
where foo is <null>.  I think the fix is to just remove ##.

-- 
Dan Eischen