Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:06:46 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <200611021706.47325.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 02 November 2006 16:41, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:19:37PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: > > >Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them > > >again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping > > >"to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all > > >of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning > > >is turned on by default. > > > > No, we will not have to do it. Why would we? It's -CURRENT, so that > > nobody really cares about backward/forward compatibility within that branch. > > > I'd very much like NOT to have to recompile all of my installed > ports on my -CURRENT boxes the day we turn on symbol versioning, > and that will require the shlib major bump of those libs that > will provide symbol versioning. If we do the bump now, we'll > have to do it again later, and that's slightly against the rule > that we only bump them once inside a branch. Hmm, that's honestly what I planned to do. :) There will only be 1 bump in HEAD though regardless of how many ABI changes we have in HEAD, as we don't really support ABI compat on HEAD. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611021706.47325.jhb>