From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 12:39:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4938816A4BF for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aphrodite.gwi.net (aphrodite.gwi.net [207.5.128.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DA343FE3 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:39:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ah4@mlz.us) Received: from andy.gwi.net (blake.gwi.net [207.5.142.8]) by aphrodite.gwi.net (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8BJdZWB089277 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:39:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ah4@mlz.us) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <646633312.1063314034@sauron.in.mat.cc> X-Homepage: http://www.nachoz.com X-PGP-Key: RSA-1024 http://www.nachoz.com/andy.pub X-System-Info-DB: PostgreSQL-7.3.3 X-System-Info-RT: rt-3-0-4 X-System-Info-WM: windowmaker-0.80.2 X-System-Info-httpd: apache-1.3.28 X-System-Info-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-#0 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:40:18 -0400 (EDT) Sender: aharriso@andy.gwi.net From: Andy Harrison To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bricolage + mod_perl. Comments welcomed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:39:37 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On 11-Sep-2003, Mathieu Arnold wrote message "Re: Bricolage + mod_perl. Comments welcomed." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >| I was thinking of creating something like the www/apache13-ssl port >| and name it apache13-mod_perl. Is this the appropiate way to solve >| the problem? Does anyone know of any other ports or programs that >| might benefit (or need) a statically compiled version of >| mod_perl+apache. >| >| Any comments or suggestions, especially by committers, are welcome. > > Why does it need mod_perl statically linked into apache ? > There are known leaks with it as a dso, but it does not harm to have it > that way. I installed bricolage once to give it a try. IIRC, they cited stability issues as their reasons, I don't recall the specifics. So I just edited the script so it wouldn't detect for mod_perl anymore and installed bricolage that way. ~~ Andy Harrison (full headers for details) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBP2DPoVPEkLgodAWVAQHY1QP/ZUBBHZUFiDOivmpSjh9Venacpczn/5Qc et5dF5BU4HRLxyWspSu/v6HZ9t42WzoTLS6uCQnymQPEedKenFFVzsmG9F3DkI3P Y4m/hvmgJr5quMg9zupj5enu+0Rkv+lESaorSquVyV+gdcoM73bXESxzJ7XVbBdL 8U3QyMwmowI= =JhQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----