From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 6 05:39:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA01915 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 05:39:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Mercury.unix.acs.cc.unt.edu (mercury.acs.unt.edu [129.120.220.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA01908 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 05:39:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@unt.edu) Received: from leonardo.cascss.unt.edu (leonardo.cascss.unt.edu [129.120.32.203]) by Mercury.unix.acs.cc.unt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04779 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 07:39:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from john@localhost) by leonardo.cascss.unt.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id HAA27576 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 07:39:44 -0500 (CDT) From: john Message-Id: <199807061239.HAA27576@leonardo.cascss.unt.edu> Subject: Intel Pro/100+ To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 07:39:44 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'd say Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B without the blink of an eye. I > don't use it in 100MB mode (yet), but in 10MB it outperforms anything I Speaking of this, is there work in progress for support of the new Intel card that replaces the 10/100B--the Pro 100+? Intels page says that the new card is driver compatible--anyone using the new card? http://support.intel.com/support/etherexpress/pro100/24362.htm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message