From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Apr 19 07:01:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA06767
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 19 Apr 1996 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA06754
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 1996 07:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id HAA09815; Fri, 19 Apr 1996 07:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199604191401.HAA09815@Root.COM>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Ron L. Kifer" <rkifer@mosquitonet.com>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Compatibility 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 19 Apr 1996 05:45:43 -0800."
             <31779907.6728@mosquitonet.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 07:01:53 -0700
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>	I'm attempting to decide what hardware I should run to use 
>FreeBSD for a server, and I am wondering if Intel's EtherExpress PRO/100 
>is compatible.  I know that Intel does not have a driver for FreeBSD nor 
>provides support.

   The Pro/100B is supported in 2.1-stable and 2.2-current.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project