From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 18:46:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FEC1065673 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829B38FC0A for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7QIYfpp036448; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:34:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o7QIYfM2036445; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:34:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:34:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jason In-Reply-To: <20100826163013.GJ19553@eggman.experts-exchange.com> Message-ID: References: <20100826154016.GA1720@PC-686.Workstation> <20100826163013.GJ19553@eggman.experts-exchange.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: Content-Disposition: INLINE X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:34:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Li Subject: Re: A seggestion about Chapter 29. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:46:43 -0000 On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Jason wrote: > I've attached a patch that should suffice. > -j > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:40:16PM +0800, Li thus spake: >> Hi all: >> >> FreeBSD Handbook -> Chapter 29 Network Servers -> >> 29.2 The inetd ?Super-Server? -> 29.2.3 Command-Line Options: >> >>> Novice users may be pleased to note that these parameters usually >>> do not need to be modified, although we mention the rate-limiting >>> options below as they be useful should you find that you are >>> receiving an excessive amount of connections. >>> A full list of options can be found in the inetd(8) manual. >> >> I am not a native English speaker, but I think this sentence is too long. >> >> It may cause some confusion. >> >> So, I suggest some modify it. This is from a forums thread, where I posted a rewrite of that poor first sentence: http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=99145&postcount=7