From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 14:56:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BAF106564A for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7992C8FC17 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1LCbLo-0004wK-Gq; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:56:44 +0300 To: ElBarto References: <37396849@bs1.sp34.ru> <01705453@bs1.sp34.ru> <49453004.9010107@linuxbox.com> <83768316_-_@bs1.sp34.ru> <4947B153.5060101@arcadebsd.org> <4947B7C4.8030004@arcadebsd.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:56:44 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4947B7C4.8030004@arcadebsd.org> (elbarto@arcadebsd.org's message of "Tue\, 16 Dec 2008 15\:14\:28 +0100") Message-ID: <35608451_-_@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Subject: openafs port(s) in general (was: Re: openafs server executables) X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:56:46 -0000 ElBarto writes: > I kind of disagree for splitting the openafs ports cause as you say > some commands are useful (more or less) for both client and server > part, but as it seems that it's going to be that way, I want the port > to be clean and with no redundancy. Let me elaborate on this a little. First off, how the port will look like is a matter of discussion. I'm open to suggestions. As well as someone may take the port I've done and suggest his version. ;-) My intention is following. The main port (say, net/openafs) will be one and will install the whole thing. And there will be some options (say WITH_SERVER_ONLY, WITH_CLIENT_ONLY) which will allow installing the relevant part. (BTW in this case who do care if a slave ports like net/openafs-server and/or openafs-client exist?) While discussing port(s) questions I was told that server and client parts are totally different and don't have anything in common. And if they do have then my ports are wrong. That and only that pushed me to find out which file belongs to which part. If you (read: developers, users and admins of OpenAFS on FreeBSD) give me a definite answer then I'll create such a port. You may even give a triple division: those files are server, those file are client, while those are common! I'll deal with it. Thanks. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve