From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 14:07:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CE216A419 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1714913C4A6 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l7RDoWAd015680; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:50:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:50:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:50:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Douglas Wells In-Reply-To: <200708271340.l7RDe6jl034237@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <200708271340.l7RDe6jl034237@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads/115211: pthread_atfork misbehaves in initial thread X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:07:03 -0000 On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Douglas Wells wrote: > > Yes, I can verify that using: > -pthread => erroneous behavior > -lthr => expected behavior > on my installation of 6.2. The problem is that the program isn't threaded yet. I'm not sure if this is really a problem since pthread_atfork() is used to protect and initialize data when a multi-threaded program forks. If the program isn't threaded, is there really a need to do this? That said, it should work regardless. -- DE