From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Apr 3 3: 0: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316B137BD81 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 03:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id DAA95835; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 03:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 03:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004031000.DAA95835@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: bin/17681: XDR does not handle 64bit data types correctly Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/17681; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: "David E. Cross" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/17681: XDR does not handle 64bit data types correctly Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:59:26 +0200 On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:33:02 EST, "David E. Cross" wrote: > Hmm? It shouldn't be. The aforementioned patch should make our xdr*() > routines look identical to NetBSDs. I'm looking at http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd/FreeBSD/xdr.diff. It results in code that doesn't seem to look anything like the code at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/basesrc/lib/libc/rpc/xdr.c?rev=1.21&cvsroot=netbsd . Am I being stupid? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message