From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 13:16:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ACD1065675 for ; Thu, 8 May 2008 13:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unga888@yahoo.com) Received: from web57007.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57007.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC8308FC13 for ; Thu, 8 May 2008 13:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unga888@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 9628 invoked by uid 60001); 8 May 2008 13:16:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=J7GPU/qkhePGA0Ad3ufBJSxATcMOI10OPMXwlkPfWRlyeyUfc0ebnKQsiJ6+ubenDXJQj8WgzYuugoZBs4hge3lzo6lwTLF6ZYrIAFDVPrM4BRl3U0vIvOi07fhbHbgx/b7zsBuX5IYC5/ZPkFKRkHOq+F5tjcPga9iWXW6gnyY=; X-YMail-OSG: ttUv3iwVM1kMuqmAgMmE_mRUrwUyJG0mEw4h5YwNa6J_6sHAD44TDko3.TvO.DW.DhE45RvuUzVN79l_1zsE9g_kT7rsVWgQTKmwe.6.967GZsHNWu4PHlUtQEI- Received: from [165.21.155.69] by web57007.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 May 2008 06:16:46 PDT Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 06:16:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Unga To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <433376.9037.qm@web57007.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Group of the newly created files and directories X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 13:16:48 -0000 --- Ivan Voras wrote: > Unga wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have noticed in FreeBSD, the group of the newly > > created files and directories are assumed by > default > > of the group of the parent directory! > > Yes, this is the difference between SYSV and BSD > systems - each variant > has its own arguments in favour so this behaviour is > not likely to be > changed. > Thanks for replies. Btw, where is the open(2) syscall is implemented in FreeBSD, just curious? Unga ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ