Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:24:34 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS DOWN Message-ID: <46482AD2.7010700@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <86lkfryjds.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20070512153532.GQ21795@elvis.mu.org> <63984.1178992555@critter.freebsd.dk> <f25m78$ik$2@sea.gmane.org> <20070513215442.GZ21795@elvis.mu.org> <46478C9A.9050807@fer.hr> <86lkfryjds.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7B72B8FCB96D0303B8169E38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > It is wrong of the PHP authors to assume that all the world is GNU / > Linux. Yes. > I see no reason not vindicate their mistakes. I do: these days I need to heavily justify using FreeBSD instead of=20 Linux, and "the applications you want to run don't actually work on=20 FreeBSD" is not a nice thing to say. I feel that nowadays it's not a contest in popularity, it's damage=20 control phase. OTOH, everyone's entitled to his own opinion and won't argue this point=20 any more. --------------enig7B72B8FCB96D0303B8169E38 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGSCrSldnAQVacBcgRAoLPAJ98A5atREoFYVZtKPUbNNkQQFqLSACg67kh vlj1MNR/yzN7LK8phB0XsYY= =Sy+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7B72B8FCB96D0303B8169E38--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46482AD2.7010700>