From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 15 18:59:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3D216A403; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hans@lambermont.dyndns.org) Received: from lambermont.dyndns.org (lambermont.dyndns.org [82.93.47.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8875343D5E; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hans@lambermont.dyndns.org) Received: by lambermont.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 895C422DC00; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:59:55 +0200 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060915185955.GG15445@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> References: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net> <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <450AA29D.9000700@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200609151616.k8FGG23C065997@fire.jhs.private> <20060915175346.GF15445@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org> <20060915153624.X1031@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060915153624.X1031@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i From: hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:59:57 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Hans Lambermont wrote: >>Julian H. Stacey wrote: >>>Stable is a misnomer that harms FreeBSD somewhat. ... >>Why not rename 'stable' into 'stable-api' ? > > Or rename it what it is: > > 6.x-BETA > > Where x == the next -RELEASE ... Also fine by me :) I followed this long thread in slight amazement, but the 'what is stable' confusion is very recognizable. I'm open for changing the name. > In the case that started this thread, it seems to be that the > developer fixed his mistake fairly quickly, which is what one would > expect ... it shouldn't be so much that he *broke* -STABLE (shit > happens, do you want your money back?), but it should be 'was he > around to reverse his mistake in a reasonable amount of time?' ... ? I think the answer is yes (and always has been afaik). regards, Hans Lambermont