From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Sep 28 05:50:09 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA12495
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 05:50:09 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA12490
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 05:50:06 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA15730
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for hackers@freebsd.org); Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:47:21 -0500
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id HAA06384 for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:34:28 -0500
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <199509281234.HAA06384@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: ports startup scripts
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:34:28 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <199509271809.LAA10620@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 27, 95 11:09:05 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 342       
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I think my biggest objection is that it requires install-time configuration
> administration as part of the install.

Why do you say that? You can just install a prebuilt canned makefile or
whatever. And startup is no special case... there are all sorts of files
that could be usefully built the same way (ttys, gettydefs, inetd.conf, ...)