Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:53:04 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228975] databases/grass7: update port and (another try to) remove BROKEN Message-ID: <bug-228975-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228975 Bug ID: 228975 Summary: databases/grass7: update port and (another try to) remove BROKEN Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch-ready Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org Attachment #194217 maintainer-approval+ Flags: Flags: maintainer-feedback+, exp-run? Created attachment 194217 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D194217&action= =3Dedit grass 7.4.0_3 Hi, Some users and I noticed errors with the package: poudriere testport seemed= OK, but bulk or install return pkg-static errors. It seems there are pkg-plist errors. So I updated the port to include some minor changes and remove lines in pkg-plist that are "incorrect". BLAS are also a difficulty, since GOTO and OPEN BLAS have not the same pkg-plist with NETLIB (default) and ATLAS conflicts with numpy (use NETLIB = as default). I need to deepen the subject, in the meantime I propose to use on= ly NETLIB. I also noticed some difficulties during the run, I added a pkg message. I would like an exp-run before merging this patch to be sure that now, is n= ot broken. Thank you. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-228975-7788>