From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 14 7:27:26 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8046C37B401 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BACE43FAF for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:27:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2EFQbrI037370; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:26:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: can mozilla 1.3 be in time for 4.8 ? From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: frank@exit.com Cc: Kris Kennaway , "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200303141524.h2EFOtIC060662@realtime.exit.com> References: <200303141524.h2EFOtIC060662@realtime.exit.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dvoDABwQXSAYqeXJKKOA" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1047655626.317.18.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 14 Mar 2003 10:27:06 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.4 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --=-dvoDABwQXSAYqeXJKKOA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 10:24, Frank Mayhar wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I expect not, we're already delaying the release because of XFree86 > > 4.3.0, so I don't want to attempt more major upgrades. >=20 > Well, considering that Mozilla 1.3 is already in the ports tree as > mozilla-devel, I wouldn't have thought it would be such a great risk. > Not that I really have an opinion one way or another, just pointing > this out. You'd think that, but Mozilla takes a long time to build, plus I have to test galeon and galeon2. I'd rather wait until I can have more time to test. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-dvoDABwQXSAYqeXJKKOA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+cfTKb2iPiv4Uz4cRAgGyAJ4rr5kADqJd6EYuJiC7eaGvacd7uQCfdXbJ r1+0pET79MW2t1RQBXa3ZF4= =4E/v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dvoDABwQXSAYqeXJKKOA-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message