From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 20:22:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0346716A418 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA7313C44B for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with SMTP; 19 Feb 2008 15:22:01 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1199900526.5046.132.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> References: <1199900526.5046.132.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:22:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1203452521.20967.155.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-1.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PowerEdge 860 (Resend) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:22:22 -0000 All: Here's an update on the PE860 w/ FBSD. See dmesg(8) for FreeBSD 6.3/amd64 (RC2) on PowerEdge 860 w/ Xeon & SATA: http://www.nycbug.org/?NAV=dmesgd;f_dmesg=;f_bsd=;f_nick=;f_descr=;dmesgid=1935#1935 Note that the ICH7 (Yes, still ICH7, not 8-9) is a SATA300 but the WDC Caviar run at 150 :~{ Broadcom ethernet has not changed -- is a "Broadcom BCM5750 B1, ASIC rev. 0x4101" (same as 850) The 860 is an 850 in just about every measurable aspect. At least they're shipping WDC instead of Maxtor. ~BAS On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:42 -0500, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > [Sorry if this is a resend to some -- I do not see that it made it > through the first time --- possibly spam filtered due to a DNS problem > with my personal domain.] > > -- > > Hi all: > > There are scattered reports in late 2006 / early 2007 of success using > the PE 860 w/ the SAS RAID, but not w/o the RAID (normally paired with a > non-Xeon). > > Would anyone be willing to share some dmesg(8) output? W/ or w/o the > RAID PERC SAS5iR mfi(4)? RELENG_6 or RELENG_7? Post your dmesg(8) to > dmesgd at NYCBUG? > > Here's an 850 w/o RAID: > http://www.nycbug.org/?NAV=dmesgd;f_dmesg=;f_bsd=;f_nick=;f_descr=poweredge;dmesgid=1724#1724 > > I'm curious how far the 860 is from the 850? > > Presumably they replaced with bge(4) with bce(4) (They offer both add on > "BC NetXtreme II 5708 1-Port" as well as "NetXtreme 5721") and also > replaced ICH7 with ICH8 or ICH9, but I'd like to check with other > satisfied customers. > > An OpenBSD dmesg(8) suggests "Intel 82801GB IDE" > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2007-02/0571.html > ...But that's in a model with a SAS5iR installed where the optical disk > is attache. > > The IDE controller may be different with no RAID. > > The lower-end 850 w/ the Core2 or genuine P4 non-Xeon is essentially > desktop-class hardware, so I don't imagine anything too exotic. > > TIA, > ~BAS -- Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.