From owner-cvs-all Fri Jul 9 11:21:41 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C6A14E10; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:21:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA25919; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:21:19 -0700 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:21:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Peter Wemm Cc: Matt Jacob , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/include reg.h src/sys/alpha/alpha procfs_machdep.c In-Reply-To: <19990709181310.05BFA79@overcee.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > > Modified files: > > sys/alpha/include reg.h > > sys/alpha/alpha procfs_machdep.c > > Log: > > Add in dbregs stubs that a committer for changes on the i386 ought to have > done. > > I was just about to commit a change to conditionalize the procfs code for > this feature. Does the Alpha support an equivalent feature? (ie: should > we stub it out until the details are filled in, or conditionalize it so > we don't add bogus files in /proc?) I don't know- it's very platform specific. I just wanted my kernels to compile again. I think it's probably appropriate to not conditionalize the procfs code because that information probably there, in a platform specific manner, for many platforms. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message