Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:04:21 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: riscv@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268684] riscv libc: fix longjmp with 0 value Message-ID: <bug-268684-40250-nzAX6OcYfI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-268684-40250@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-268684-40250@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268684 Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jrtc27@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org> --- This is a subset of https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29363 which I should get b= ack to. Note I instead opted for a conditional li, as both those instructions compress and in theory should be macro-op fusable, or have a short forward-branch optimisation applied, on cores that implement that. I believe the SiFive 7 series does the latter. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268684-40250-nzAX6OcYfI>