Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:21:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Matt Jacob <mjacob@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/include reg.h src/sys/alpha/alpha procfs_machdep.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907091119580.25014-100000@semuta.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <19990709181310.05BFA79@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > Modified files: > > sys/alpha/include reg.h > > sys/alpha/alpha procfs_machdep.c > > Log: > > Add in dbregs stubs that a committer for changes on the i386 ought to have > done. > > I was just about to commit a change to conditionalize the procfs code for > this feature. Does the Alpha support an equivalent feature? (ie: should > we stub it out until the details are filled in, or conditionalize it so > we don't add bogus files in /proc?) I don't know- it's very platform specific. I just wanted my kernels to compile again. I think it's probably appropriate to not conditionalize the procfs code because that information probably there, in a platform specific manner, for many platforms. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907091119580.25014-100000>