From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 10 23:12:16 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED80F16A543
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:12:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-244.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net
	[66.125.9.244])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E1243D54
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:12:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@pursued-with.net)
Received: from babelfish.pursued-with.net (babelfish.pursued-with.net
	[10.0.0.42])	by pursued-with.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A76E221E7DC; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Stevens <freebsd@pursued-with.net>
To: JJB <Barbish3@adelphia.net>
In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOENNGIAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.58.0408101605130.2937@onorysvfu.chefhrq-jvgu.arg>
References: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOENNGIAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: Top posting solution
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd@pursued-with.net
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:12:17 -0000

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, JJB wrote:

> So your a hard core purest on the other side of the coin.

You know absolutely nothing about my position on this subject other than
what you infer from the formatting of the posts I've made.  The fact that
I reject specious argument from incorrect facts is irrelevant to how I
feel about top posting.

> You can nit pick about wording all you want. It still does not detract
> from the fact that there is an 'FIX' to change the behavior of
> MS/windows top posting. As always, the reader has the chose in how they
> want to reply to posts on this list, top or bottom posting.

Or whether to use a spell/grammar checker, of course.  Might as well
switch fires.

KeS